THE MEDUSA GLANCE

The Medusa Glance cover

 

ΠΡΩΤΑ ΧΡΟΝΙΑ

 

Οι πατούχες γελαστά πλατσούριζαν

στα πηγαδάκια τα γιομάτα ζωή

κι η μάνα παραπέρα σκυφτή —

μανάδες πάντοτες σκυφτά

του πόνου πίναν το κρασί —

μάζευε πεταλίδες και κοχύλια

 

κι ο σύντροφος του πεπρωμένου μου

αδερφός της ξεγνιασιάς μου

έξυπνα πίσω απ’ τα καβούρια με χέρι

επιδέξιο και σβέλτο τ’ άρπαζε πριχού

γοργά κρυφτούν σε κώχες και μικρές σπηλιές

μονάχα τα καβούρια που γνωρίζουν

 

κι ήταν οι μέρες μίσους

που ο πατέρας στην εξορία έτρεχε

απ’ των δοσίλογων τα νύχια να γλυτώσει

κι από νωρίς της πίκρας το ψωμί γευτήκαμε

κι από νωρίς που ντροπαλά

σάν τα κλαριά τεντώσαμε το μάκρος,

σάν δυό πουλιά πριχού

τήν ώρα μας που ανδρειωθήκαμε

 

 

EARLY YEARS

Laughing benevolence our soles

splashed into small water pools

filled by moving life

and further away our mother stooped,

mothers always stooped drank bitterness,

and collected sea snails and abalone

 

my brother, my Fate’s choice

moved his hand swiftly to grab

the little crab before it took refuge

in the crevasse only a crab could see

and we lived in fear for our father was

in a land unknown to our little world,

exiled, away from the pangs of the police

informants: such was our luck

that early in life we tasted

the bitter orphan water

yet like tree branches we stretched our limbs

against the elements

and like birds prematurely we grew wings

 

THE MEDUSA GLANCE, Ekstasis Editions, Victoria, BC, 2017

 

Advertisements

SECOND ADVENT OF ZEUS-REVIEW

merging dimensions cover

ΔΕΥΤΕΡΗ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΔΙΑ — ΚΡΙΤΙΚΗ

 

~João da Penha

 

ΠΟΙΗΤΗΣ, ΤΟΥ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΥ

 

Αν πάρουμε σαν παράδειγμα το τραγούδι του Frank Sinatra που λέει ότι, όλοι τραγουδούν αλλά μόνον δέκα με δώδεκα τραγουδιστές υπάρχουν, μπορούμε να πούμε ότι μόνο τόσοι λίγοι αληθινοί ποιητές υπάρχουν στον κόσμο — εδώ και παντού, ποιητές του χθές ή σημερνοί. Κι υποπτεύομαι ότι δεν θα υπάρξουν ποτέ πολλοί ή τουλάχιστον δεν θα υπάρξουν πολλοί εξαιρετικοί. Κι είμαι σίγουρος πως δεν θα υπάρξουν τόσοι πολλοί όσα τα βιβλία ποίησης που εκδίδονται και προωθούνται από οικονομικά ισχυρούς φορείς και με τίτλους που είναι μόνο για να εντυπωσιάσουν. Συναντούμε πολλές ποιητικές εξαασκήσεις κάνουν ακριβώς αυτό: μιαν εξάσκηση ή φαντάζονται ότι κάνουν. Αλλά εκείνοι που γράφουν εξαιρετική ποίηση είναι λίγοι από λίγους χαρισματικούς που ανήκουν σε μια ξεχωριστή κλάση ανθρώπων.

 

Ο Schiller είπε ότι δεν αρκεί να γράψει κανείς καλούς στίχους για να αυτοονομαστεί ποιητής γιατί ο καθένας κι απανταχού μπορεί να γράψει μερικούς στίχους αλλά αυτοί που γράφουν εξαιρετική ποίηση είναι πολύ λίγοι όπως ανέφερα πιο πάνω. Μόνον η μικρή αυτή κλάση ανθρώπων έχει το χάρτη του μονοπατιού. Κι όσοι το έχουν και γνωρίζουν πώς να το διαβάζουν, και ξέρουν πώς να το εξηγούν, αυτοί μόνο ηγούνται και οδηγούν όλους τους άλλους, όλους μας εννοώ, που αποτελούμε την ομάδα των δημιουργών-ποιητών, προς τον τόπο της ποίησης, κι αν είμαστε ευαίσθητοι στα των Μουσών θα καταλάβουμε. Οι υπόλοιποι θα κάνουν απλά τουρισμό.

 

Ο Eric Ponty, που μετέφρασε το βιβλίο ποίησης του Μανώλη Αλυγιζάκη στην Πορτογαλική γλώσσα, έχει το χάρτη του μονοπατιού γιατί είναι ο ίδιος ένας αυθεντικός ποιητής κι η ωριμότητά του είναι ολοφάνερη, όπως μας υπογραμίζει η έκδοση του “Retirement Boy Goes to the Circus in Brodowski” (Εκδόσεις Μούσα, Σάο Πάολο, Βραζιλία, 2003).

 

Στο βιβλίο του Μανώλη Αλυγιζάκη, ΔΕΥΤΕΡΗ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΔΙΑ που μετέφρασε ο Eric Ponty και συγκεκριμένα στο ποίημα, ΑΠΟΛΛΩΝΑΣ,

 

ΑΠΟΛΛΩΝΑΣ

 

Στον ήλιο του Απόλλωνα μεγάλωσα

 

λεπτά εκφραστικά

μόνος στα σκοτεινά

πρoτού τα μάτια ανοίξω

είχα για συνοδία

το νόμο της αποτυχίας

 

που εγεννήθηκα τυφλός

μ’ είπαν κι αιρετικό

μια επανάσταση στη γέννησή της

πριν καν μια λέξη να ειπώ

κλάμα λυπητερό ή πόνου

 

συγκέντρωσα όλη τη δύναμή μου

το ραντεβού μου με το θάνατο εταχτοποίησα

ώρες πριν γεννηθώ

στα χέρια της μητέρας

νιογένητη γιορτή

λάθος επιτρεπταίο

 

δυο πόδια για να περπατώ

μία καρδιά

για να αισθάνομαι

κι άλλα ανθρώπινα

μεγαλοσύνης σύσσημα

 

Η ανάπτυξη του ποιήματος αυτού αποδεικνύει ότι ο χώρος του ποιητή δεν υποκλείνεται μπροστά σε καθορισμένους λεκτικούς και κανόνες αλληλουχίας που κυβερνούν τον κόσμο της εμπειρίας (τίποτα δεν είναι πιο πραγματικό απ’ το τίποτα, είπε ο Δημόκριτος) κι οι ποιητές το γνωρίζουν αυτό καλά. Γι’ αυτό ακριβώς υπάρχει και το ειδικό λογικό. Ειδικό αλλά όχι αμφισβηταίο ή αυθαίρετο. Ειδικό γιατί οι ποιητές κατέχουν το “κλειδί του βασιλείου”.

 

Ο Croce και ο Vossler, τώρα που το θυμήθηκα, πολέμισαν ένα γύρω στη φράση Η Στρογγυλή Τράπεζα είναι τετράγωνη και για τον Ιταλό αναλυτή η φράση αυτή δηλώνει ότι δεν υπάρχει καθόλου λογική έννοια, ενώ ο Γερμανός αναλυτής έλαβε τη φράση αυτή σαν αληθινή, από αισθητική και γραμματολογική άποψη αδιαφορώντας για το λογικά αδύνατο. Ο Vossler κι “άλλοι πολλοί πριν και μετά απ’ αυτόν κατάλαβαν ότι οι ποιητές είναι ο μόνοι που δημιουργούν την πραγματικότητα. Στην κυριολεξία οι ποιητές δημιουργούν κόσμους όπως στα ποιήματα του Μανώλη Αλυγιζάκη που μετέφρασε ο Eric Ponty, μουσικός αλλά και ποιητής, που ακολουθούν τη συμβουλή του Wagner ότι ο ποιητής τονώνει το αντιληπτό του ανθρώπου και τον οδηγεί στο να κάνει νέους συνδυασμούς του αντιληπτέου έχοντας σαν οδηγό την αισθητική του αντίληψη.

 

Αν, όπως μας λέει ο Eric Ponty σ’ ένα απ’ τα ποιήματα αυτά,

 

στα χέρια της μητέρας

νιογένητη γιορτή

λάθος επιτρεπταίο

δυο πόδια για να περπατώ

 

είναι εξ ίσου αληθινό και πρέπει πάντα να δίνουμε προσοχή στο τί μας λένε οι ποιητές (λίγοι εξηγούν τις λέξεις καλύτερα απ’ τους ποιητές, γείτονες των φιλοσόφων). Ο Eric Ponty, στο απόγειο της δημιουργικής του καρριέρας, μας λέει και μας υπογραμμίζει πολλά αφού η μετάφραση των ποιημάτων ΔΕΥΤΕΡΗ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΔΙΑ του Κρητικού-Καναδού ποιητή, συγγραφέα και μεταφραστή Μανώλη Αλυγιζάκη δεν είναι τίποτε άλλο από ένα ποιητικό αριστούργημα.

 

“…για τη συνεχή του αντανάκλαση-ενδοσκόπηση και λυρική φωνή και τον τρόπο που βλέπει την ύπαρξη όχι σαν ένα στείρο αντικείμενο, αλλά σαν ένα σύνθετο δυναμικό που έχει τη δική του εξαιρετική και ιδιόμορφη εικόνα του αληθινού…” όπως μας λέει ο ποιητής-κριτικός Ηλίας Τουρτίδης, είναι αναγκαίο να δώσουμε προσοχή στη φωνή του Μανώλη Αλυγιζάκη μέσω της μετάφρασης του Eric Ponty που είναι ένας ταλαντούχος σημερνός ποιητής.

 

 

~ João da Penha, δημοσιογράφος, συνταξιούχος καθηγητής, που έχει συναργαστεί με πάμπολλα λογοτεχνικά περιοδικά κι εφημερίδες. Επίσης συγγραφέας πολλών βιβλίων όπως των What Is Existentialism (Brasiliense, 2011, 17. ed.) And Philosophical Periods (Ática 2000, 4. ed.). Έχει μεταφράσει για λογοτεχνικά περιοδικά κι εφημερίδες ποίηση των Ρώσων  Sierguêi Iessiênin and Alieksandr Blok και διηγήμτα των José María Argüedas, Júlio Cortázar and Gabriel García Márquez, που εκδόθηκανστη λατινική Αμερική.

 

 

 

SECOND ASDVENT OF ZEUS REVIEW

By João da Penha

 

 

POET, OF FACT.

 

 

Singing, everyone sings, but singers only about ten or twelve.

 

The boutade, they say, is by Frank Sinatra, whose remarkable vocal skills – it seems to me – have not been contested to this day.

To paraphrase the song of the great American singer, it can be said that there are not so many poets like this in the world – here and elsewhere, yesterday and today. I suspect that there will never be many poets, or at least many great poets. At least, I am convinced, not as many as the growing number of edited collections suggest, by marketing strategy arts, just under hyperbolic titles. Many poetic exercise exercises it, or imagine exercising it. But to make great poetry is grace granted to a minority; to a caste of elect, therefore.

Schiller, by the way, has already warned that it is not enough to create good verses so that its author considers himself a poet. Now, to do verses, almost everyone, at some point in life, has already done. To make POETRY, however, is the road traveled by the minority referred to above. Only she, this chosen caste, has the map of the trail. Whoever holds it, who knows how to read it, interprets its coordinates, leads the others, that is, all of us, who have formed this majority, as creators, of the poetic territory, only by traveling, if sensitive to the Muses, as travelers. For the senseless, the tour of this territory will be nothing more than mere tourism.

Eric Ponty has the map of the trail. He is an authentic poet. Maturity is everything, the supreme bard in the “King Lear” told us. Poet, owner of his craft, poet who reached the full domain of poetic making.

His poetic virtuosity, Ponty has already shown and demonstrated in the magnificent “Retirement Boy Goes to the Circus in Brodowski” (Musa Publishing House, São Paulo, 2003.) In this book with its translation, our poet only makes it reaffirmed. For example when translating this stanza of Manolis’ poem Apollo, which reminds us of Paul Valéry’s Socratic prose in Eupalinos Lame et la Danse Dialogue De L arbre:

 

APOLLO

 

And I grew under Apollo’s sun

 

minutes of expressiveness

alone in darkness and

before I opened my eyes

I was accompanied

by the law of failure

born blind and

accused of heresy

a revolution in its making

even before I could utter

a groan or a begging cry

 

I gathered all my strength

to pick a date with death

hours before I appeared

in my mother’s arms

newborn festivity

error permitted

two legs just to walk

a heart as if

to feel emotion and

other human traces

of grandeur

 

 

 

APOLO

 

E eu cresci sob o sol de Apolo

 

Minutos de expressividade

Sozinho nas trevas e

Antes de abrir os meus olhos

Eu estava acompanhado

Pela lei da bobagem

 

Nasceu cega e

Acusada de heresia

Uma conflagração na sua fazendo

Mesmo antes que eu pudesse articular

Um suspiro ou um grito a mendigar

 

Eu ajuntei toda minha força

A seleção de uma data com a morte

Horas antes eu semelhava

Nos meus braços da minha mãe

Festa de um recém-nascido

Erro admitido

As duas pernas apenas a pé

Um coração como se

Sentisse à emoção e

Outros traços humanos

Da grandeza

 

This defense can be translated as the recognition that poets inhabit a province where logic does not bow down to the principles that govern the empirical world (nothing is more real than nothing, pre-Socratic Democritus preached). Poets know that. That’s why your particular logic. Particular, but not arbitrary. Particular because only they have the “kingdom key”.

Croce and Vossler, the memory comes to me now, they polemicized around the phrase: “The round table is square”. For the Italian thinker, the phrase would sum up to a total absence of meaning, illogical, while the German critic saw it as true, aesthetically and grammatically valid, caring little that logically impossible. Vossler, like so many others, before and after him, realized that the poet is the one who creates realities. Poets are creators of worlds. Therefore, in the poems translated by Eric Ponty, a musician, as well as a poet, he follows the Wagnerian advice that the poet does nothing but stimulate the understanding, leading the reader to make new combinations on the subject already known by means of sensory perception.

If, as Ponty tells us in one of the translated poems, “In My Mother’s Arms /newborn festivity / error permitted / two legs just to walk” it is equally true that we should listen to what poets have to say (few decipher the world better than poets, neighbors to philosophers). Eric Ponty, at the height of his creative force, has much to tell us through these translations as he did with Manolis-a Canadian Greek poet who’s credit is The Second Advent of Zeus a masterful piece.

 

“…for his sustained reflection, for a lyrical voice, and an invitation to see life not as a barren subject, but as a complex dynamic that has its own extraordinary design and imago of truth” as Ilya Tourtidis tells us, it is urgent that we listen to Manolis’ voice through the translation of the poet-translator Ponty, one of the most talented of his time.

 

 

 

João da Penha, a journalist and retired professor, collaborated in cultural publications such as Encounters with Brazilian Civilization, Cult and Tempo Brasileiro. Author, among other books, of What Is Existentialism (Brasiliense, 2011, 17. ed.) And Philosophical Periods (Ática 2000, 4. ed.), Translated for magazines and newspapers poems by Russians Sierguêi Iessiênin and Alieksandr Blok, and short stories By José María Argüedas, Júlio Cortázar and Gabriel García Márquez, published in The first short stories of ten masters of Latin American narrative (Paz e Terra, 1978). How to read Wittgenstein. São Paulo: Paulus, 2013.

 

 

Arc Poetry Magazine Review

ARC POETRY MAGAZINE FEATURE REVIEW

 

Harold Rhenisch

 

Love and War and Oranges

Philip Resnick. Footsteps of the Past. Vancouver: Ronsdale Press, 2015.

Nick Papaxanthos. Love Me Tender. Toronto: Mansfield Press, 2015.

Dimitris Lianinis. Hours of the Stars. Surrey, BC: Libros Libertad, 2015.

Tzoutzi Matzourani. Hear Me Out: Letters to My Ex-Lover. Surrey, BC: Libros Libertad, 2015

 

Classicism is the belief that adherence to past models recreates their successes. It’s why art students draw from the nude, formalists write sonnets, and Germany is structured on Goethe’s Faust. It’s also why Canadian poets write in a series of stances called, variously: self-actualization, emotional honesty, imagism, verse, activism, English and French, surrealism, glosas, villanelles, open fields, vers libre, academic deconstruction, and that juggling trick Leonard Cohen did with the oranges. Most commonly, classicism references the artistic works of ancient Greece—usually to foster humanist values. In this review I look at four Canadian poetry books that reference classical Greek modes.

 

Philip Resnick’s Footsteps of the Past is exquisite. Poems such as “West Coast Mythis-torema” and “Paris on a Sunday Afternoon” are tours de force of Greek metrics: mus­cular objects like Greek statues in marble: “limbs and flesh so dear / that words, you feel, are puffs of hollow air, / and images of love / Pygmalions carved in sandstone or in wax” (“Paris on a Sunday Afternoon”). Most of the other poems are satires. My work­ing model: back in the day, such jibes were sung by drunkards caught up in moonlit orgies in the Aegean hills; in civic life, satirical dramas stripped off the masks of power in dances of violence and forgiveness. Resnick’s are elegiac: “faces in a sullied looking glass / that must be digitalized / before they turn to dust” (“Cuarentena”). Often, they sound like pulpit work: “what is familiar becomes with time / a parasite in the intes­tinal flora” (“The Crown in Canada”). Resnick’s honoured dead aren’t the heroic dead of Homer and Alice Oswald, who fight in eternal battle on the scorched plains of the Middle East. They’re ghoulish. In Resnick’s reckoning, classical Greece was a wellspring of Western ideals; its citizens lived in common society, united with land and its spirits. In his Canada, this spirit lingers on in decaying fragments. The millions of people of his Vancouver, whose intellectual traditions honour Daphne and Apollo, have washed up on the shores of Raven’s sea. They have jettisoned classical unity in favour of the ability to live in tall glass rectangles. This is not courage. Reflecting the city’s ennui, many of Resnick’s poems fizzle away, as if a god has been filled with power but then, when fate hangs in the balance, slips down to the pub for a beer and to watch the Canucks lose the Stanley Cup. Classicism here grits its teeth to reveal a broad gap between realities and professed ideals, in beautiful but sad models of civic, occasional and funereal verse.

 

Nick Papaxanthos’ Love Me Tender draws on the oracular tradition of the priestesses of Apollo, who breathed sulfuric vapours to predict the future—in riddles that would ex­cite any neurolinguistic programmer today. His Love Me Tender is like a bomb of dada lobbed into an opposing trench in the Somme: “avocados fudge / blimps to raisins / the inning, lungs / in the fatso and / braids toothpaste.” It’s a bit blunt. Bombs are. Dada is. The sections “The Next Arrangement of Molecules” and “Chairlift to Hell,” though, are classic surrealist games. They just go by at warp speed, that’s all—like fanning a deck of tarot cards instead of laying them down one by one. Here’s one, to give you a taste: “the yo-yo panorama looks out gently / then returns, tinged with blood” (“At the Peak of Mt. Murder”). Fun, or what!? It’s language interrogating itself using a random­ness generator. No, wait: it’s René Char redux, differing only from the original in that Char learned his poetics in the 1940s Resistance, which certainly beat the heroism of running into machine gun fire or its contemporary equivalent, the randomness gener­ator. In Papaxanthos, the resistance continues—just faster than human sight, that’s all, and through the global universalism of surreal imagery. What was originally a group of exiles aggrandizing their verbal powerlessness during WWI by replacing art with nonsense (as the war had replaced civilization with destruction) is now Papaxanthos aggrandizing the hurlers of Molotov cocktails (rather than hurling them.) Have a look at one of his glorifications: “The Meadow of Dents // Light slams the flowers on its way out.” It’s clever stuff. Like the Dadaists, its topic is its own cleverness. It is display and a desire to disappear all at once. That can’t be healthy. For the Dadaists, a gesture like that was violent. Here the violence is turned inward. This is dangerous territory. Another example might help: “In the Atmosphere // of headlight beams and floral bedsheets, / voices trade hellos / from faces turning shyly away.” (Both examples are from “The Next Arrangement of Molecules.”) The text here has replaced “self” identity. Now the text is lobbing the IEDs. The self? The poor thing is embarrassed. Maybe that’s how a poet has to survive in Resnick’s anti-culture: a strong, victorious book is obscured to survive within the culture it tries to replace. That’s the necessary work of a clown. It’s sad that such a ruse is needed. These surreal sequences would be stronger if not vacuum-packed into a container of a size and shape better suited to hold the ashes of Bliss Carman. Such a nod to the norms of Canadian book editing dulls the revolution within these devices. It aestheticizes them. It makes them “safe,” just another turn within a potpourri of verbal gymnastics, compressed to fit. They aren’t the aesthetic objects the book shape—and the Canadian sensibility behind it—makes them to be, and they sure aren’t safe. They deserve their own launch vehicles.

 

Dimitris Liantinis’ Hours of the Stars draws on Greek culture from within. Where Papaxanthos manipulates Greek oracular tradition through secular surrealism, Liantinis uses similarly bizarre imagery within an unbroken connection with the Greek panthe­on. Where Papaxanthos’s Canadian postmodernism employs psychology and industrial identity severed from the earth to view its roots as flotsam left over after a tsunami, recombined into steam punk bangles such as “A sink washes the air’s hands / A detour around a candle darts” (“The Vaccinated Dawn”), Liantinis’ imagery is the oracle: “mem­oirs will be written only / on the edge of the sword / that cracks the cheekbones of the night like walnuts” (“Hercules”). Liantinis lacks Resnick’s and Papaxanthos’s sense of loss, tragedy, romance and bathos. His references to the gods fill the space their emp­tiness fills. In “Aquarius,” for example, an un-named god unearths “the viscera of the desert,” but then miracle—not a burning bush but “Suddenly water drops shone / on the weight of its tiredness and / filled the sun with passengers.” It is a warning against see­ing Greece as the root of the Western tradition, which shows the material faces of God and uses art to create archetype. After all, it’s also the source of Eastern tradition, which apprehends God as archetype and uses art to arrive at material presence. This is a book to set with Seferis, Cavafy and Ritsos. It’s the real deal.

 

Of course, classical tradition isn’t just a high testosterone phalanx of monks and sui­cide bombers battling to see who has the better bronze sword and who the best desert in which to watch the mind writing on silence. It also contains Sappho, writing of her lesbian lover so passionately that no love poem has surpassed hers in 2600 years. In Hear Me Out: Letters to My Ex-Lover, Tzoutzi Matzourani makes direct nods to her: “The agony, the heart ache, the pain in the guts, the longing the yearning each felt for the other, the match, the writhing, the complete surrender” (“The Road to Hell”). She discards many parts of classical tradition. She keeps precision: “What you loved of me, you killed” (“What You Loved”). She sidesteps Plato’s annoying questioning by directly addressing her beloved. She keeps elegy: “Because simply you can’t grasp onto anyone’s hand you can’t grasp onto anything” (“The Lost 1%”)—like Heraclitus and the river you can’t step into twice: “My dry lips still had the taste of watermelon we ate at lunch time, and now, evening already, my glance was glued high up in the sky” (“A Slice of Moon With the Scent of Watermelon Fragrance”). Classical metrics are eschewed for simple stanzas built around exquisite semantic rhythms and the ebbs and flows of prose. These are the sea’s tides, so present they need never be mentioned. Don’t be fooled, though: these letters gradually reveal themselves as notes to: Matzourani’s ex-lovers, the things she has loved, and poetry’s passions and devotions. There is no oracle. This is a real woman, exploring the day-to-day triumphs and pains of love in all of its particulars, consciously aware that she is replacing an entire classical tradition of men jabbering about politics, sociology, religion, architecture, literature, philosophy, etc., with an alter­nate lens: love, and its devotions and attentions. Out of the four books here, all steeped in Greece, it’s hers that extends humanism, and with fused passion, wit and intellect. If an entire century were built on her model, we would do well.

 

        Hours of the Stars and Hear Me Out are poetic triumphs.

 

 

The Second Advent of Zeus-Review

merging dimensions cover

 

THE SECOND ADVENT OF ZEUS// REVIEW

By João da Penha

 

 

POET, OF FACT.

 

 

Singing, everyone sings, but singers only about ten or twelve.

 

The boutade, they say, is by Frank Sinatra, whose remarkable vocal skills – it seems to me – have not been contested to this day.

To paraphrase the song of the great American singer, it can be said that there are not so many poets like this in the world – here and elsewhere, yesterday and today. I suspect that there will never be many poets, or at least many great poets. At least, I am convinced, not as many as the growing number of edited collections suggest, by marketing strategy arts, just under hyperbolic titles.

Many poetic exercise exercises it, or imagine exercising it. But to make great poetry is grace granted to a minority; to a caste of elect, therefore.

Schiller, by the way, has already warned that it is not enough to create good verses so that its author considers himself a poet. Now, to do verses, almost everyone, at some point in life, has already done. To make POETRY, however, is the road traveled by the minority referred to above. Only she, this chosen caste, has the map of the trail. Whoever holds it, who knows how to read it, interprets its coordinates, leads the others, that is, all of us, who have formed this majority, as creators, of the poetic territory, only by traveling, if sensitive to the Muses, as travelers. For the senseless, the tour of this territory will be nothing more than mere tourism.

Eric Ponty has the map of the trail. He is an authentic poet. Maturity is everything, the supreme bard in the “King Lear” told us. Poet, owner of his craft, poet who reached the full domain of poetic making.

His poetic virtuosity, Ponty has already shown and demonstrated in the magnificent “Retirement Boy Goes to the Circus in Brodowski” (Musa Publishing House, São Paulo, 2003.) In this book with its translation, our poet only makes it reaffirmed. For example when translating this stanza of Manolis’ poem Apollo, which reminds us of Paul Valéry’s Socratic prose in Eupalinos Lame et la Danse Dialogue De L arbre:

 

APOLLO

 

And I grew under Apollo’s sun

 

minutes of expressiveness

alone in darkness and

before I opened my eyes

I was accompanied

by the law of failure

born blind and

accused of heresy

a revolution in its making

even before I could utter

a groan or a begging cry

 

I gathered all my strength

to pick a date with death

hours before I appeared

in my mother’s arms

newborn festivity

error permitted

two legs just to walk

a heart as if

to feel emotion and

other human traces

of grandeur

 

 

 

APOLO

 

E eu cresci sob o sol de Apolo

 

Minutos de expressividade

Sozinho nas trevas e

Antes de abrir os meus olhos

Eu estava acompanhado

Pela lei da bobagem

 

Nasceu cega e

Acusada de heresia

Uma conflagração na sua fazendo

Mesmo antes que eu pudesse articular

Um suspiro ou um grito a mendigar

 

Eu ajuntei toda minha força

A seleção de uma data com a morte

Horas antes eu semelhava

Nos meus braços da minha mãe

Festa de um recém-nascido

Erro admitido

As duas pernas apenas a pé

Um coração como se

Sentisse à emoção e

Outros traços humanos

Da grandeza

 

This defense can be translated as the recognition that poets inhabit a province where logic does not bow down to the principles that govern the empirical world (nothing is more real than nothing, pre-Socratic Democritus preached). Poets know that. That’s why your particular logic. Particular, but not arbitrary. Particular because only they have the “kingdom key”.

Croce and Vossler, the memory comes to me now, they polemicized around the phrase: “The round table is square”. For the Italian thinker, the phrase would sum up to a total absence of meaning, illogical, while the German critic saw it as true, aesthetically and grammatically valid, caring little that logically impossible. Vossler, like so many others, before and after him, realized that the poet is the one who creates realities. Poets are creators of worlds. Therefore, in the poems translated by Eric Ponty, a musician, as well as a poet, he follows the Wagnerian advice that the poet does nothing but stimulate the understanding, leading the reader to make new combinations on the subject already known by means of sensory perception.

If, as Ponty tells us in one of the translated poems, “In My Mother’s Arms /newborn festivity / error permitted / two legs just to walk” it is equally true that we should listen to what poets have to say (few decipher the world better than poets, neighbors to philosophers). Eric Ponty, at the height of his creative force, has much to tell us through these translations as he did with Manolis-a Canadian Greek poet who’s credit is The Second Advent of Zeus a masterful piece.

 

“…for his sustained reflection, for a lyrical voice, and an invitation to see life not as a barren subject, but as a complex dynamic that has its own extraordinary design and imago of truth” as Ilya Tourtidis tells us, it is urgent that we listen to Manolis’ voice through the translation of the poet-translator Ponty, one of the most talented of his time.

 

 

 

João da Penha, a journalist and retired professor, collaborated in cultural publications such as Encounters with Brazilian Civilization, Cult and Tempo Brasileiro. Author, among other books, of What Is Existentialism (Brasiliense, 2011, 17. ed.) And Philosophical Periods (Ática 2000, 4. ed.), Translated for magazines and newspapers poems by Russians Sierguêi Iessiênin and Alieksandr Blok, and short stories By José María Argüedas, Júlio Cortázar and Gabriel García Márquez, published in The first short stories of ten masters of Latin American narrative (Paz e Terra, 1978). How to read Wittgenstein. São Paulo: Paulus, 2013.

 

 

POETRY by MANOLIS ALIGIZAKIS/A REVIEW

!cid_37686FD8483E4EE08140DCAFC02D5FF2@userHP

SENSUALITY in MANOLIS’ POETRY COMPARED TO CAVAFY AND YANNIS RITSOS

 

As history teaches us, the contrast between life and art has made it easy to think of Cavafy in the abstract, as an artist whose work exists free from tradition and attachment to a specific moment in time. This trend has been prompted by the two elements of his poetry for which he is most famous: his surprisingly contemporary theme (one of his themes, at least), and his attractive and direct style.

Certainly there have always been many readers who appreciate the so-called historical poems, situated in magical places of the Mediterranean during times that have been long dead and acrimonious with sociable irony and a certain tired stoicism. (“Ithaca gave you the beautiful journey, / without her you would not have put in the passage. / But now she has nothing to give you,” he writes in what may be the most famous evocation of ancient Greek culture: the journey is always more important than the fatefully disappointing destination.) This can be seen in the poem:

Thermopylae

Honor to all of those who in their lives

have settled on, and guard, a Thermopylae.

Never stirring from their obligations;

just and equitable in all of their affairs,

but full of pity, nonetheless, and of compassion;

generous whenever they’re rich, and again

when they’re poor, generous in small things,

and helping out, again, as much as they are able;

always speaking nothing but the truth,

yet without any hatred for those who lie.

And more honor still is due to them

when they foresee (and many do foresee)

that Ephialtes will make his appearance in the end,

and that the Medes will eventually break through

 

But it is probably fair to say that the popular reputation of Cavafy rests almost entirely on the remarkably preexisting way in which his other “sensual” poems, often not considered as this poet’s gift, deal with the ever-fascinating and pertinent themes of erotic desire, realization and loss.

The way, too, when memory preserves what desire so often cannot sustain. That desire and longing only makes it appear more contemporary, closer to our own times. Perhaps this is the case with Manolis’ poem:

Lamppost

 

After leaving our marks

on the sole lamppost

we parted

she to the west

I to the east

with a promise

to meet again

by this lamppost

and trace our marks

though we never thought of the Sirens

the Cyclops and the angry Poseidon

though we never thought of the pricey

ferryman

 

No one but Cavafy, who studied history not only eagerly but with a studious respect and meticulous attention to detail, would have recognized the dangers of abstracting people from their historical contexts; and nowhere is this abstraction more dangerous than in the case of Cavafy himself.

 

THE CITY

 

You said: “I’ll go to another land, to another sea;
I’ll find another city better than this one.
Every effort I make is ill-fated, doomed;
and my heart —like a dead thing—lies buried.
How long will my mind continue to wither like this?
Everywhere I turn my eyes, wherever they happen to fall
I see the black ruins of my life, here
where I’ve squandered, wasted and ruined so many years.”
New lands you will not find, you will not find other seas.
The city will follow you. You will return to the same streets.
You will age in the same neighborhoods; and in these
same houses you will turn gray. You will always
arrive in the same city. Don’t even hope to escape it,
there is no ship for you, no road out of town.
As you have wasted your life here, in this small corner
you’ve wasted it in the whole world.

 

Surely his work is as good as great poetry can be and at the same time timeless in the way we like to think that great literature can be alchemizing details of the poet’s life, times and obsessions into something relevant to a large audience over the years and even centuries.

But the tendency to see Cavafy as one of us, as one in our own time, speaking to us with a voice that is transparent and admittedly ours about things whose meaning is self-evident, threatens to take away a specific detail one that, if we give it back to him, makes him look larger than life and more a poet of the future, as it was once described, rather than the time he lived in. This detail also pertains to the biography of Manolis who refers to mythical passages of his home-country and unfolds scenes of sensuality, abandonment and loss.

Cavafy’s style, to begin with, is far less prosaic, much richer although not musical, and rooted deeply in the nineteenth century in which he lived for more than half of its life. Some readers will be surprised to learn that many of Cavafy’s poems, even when he was almost forty, were cast as sonnets or other prepared forms of verse.

Manolis was born in Kolibari a small village west of Chania on the Greek island of Crete in 1947. At an early age his family took him first to Thessaloniki and then to Athens where he was educated, earning a Bachelor of Science in Political Science from the Panteion University of Athens.

The subject in some of Cavafy which tend to be overlooked by readers as difficult are the poems deliberately placed in the dark, geographical and temporal margins of the Greek past: poems which seem not to have much to do with today’s concerns and are often passed in favor of works with more contemporary appeal.

Perhaps this is the case with Manolis who draws from the same Greek sources as Cavafy does making historical references to Greece, the cradle where his soul was born, when he creates the Greek myths interacted in his contemporary poetry. Even far from his motherland Greece where he resides now he still retains in his poetic memory, images and themes he channels through verve in this book and others.

 

Can Manolis channel the beauty as easily as he describes in his verse? “An ancient time leader / as an anointed and pious / a musical instrument of candor flowing free / ready to speak with words that relieve pain and free the soul?” Yes its main tool is its firsthand experience of the power of Eros. His psychological makeup attracts and conveys authenticity and happiness based on his worship and being adored by sensual and provocative female figures exposing him in an ecstatic transcendence through his bodies of lust and his deep love and dedicated understanding. It is obvious that he finds his purpose in falling in love passionately for his beloved.

He does not hide that before he emerged he wanted to become “a festival / movement song of a bird / a vesper / a simple sigh / that will heal the lips of his beloved.” If he feels impotent in the face of inconceivable and unlimited Destiny, he declares that a woman’s embrace beckons him and he likes to give in to his passion: “dark and vague circle / forever indeterminable / and this, the command / and this, the Obedience / This, the orgasm / and this, the Eros / and this is you.” He feels being favored by Eros he diffuses his burning passion with light that fills his erotic verses. As a gallant defender of lust and sensuality and the true emotions of love, he delivers the joy and joy to the soul.

 

Both idealism and pragmatism, messianism, but also the tradition in the languor of the senses, the subjects of love dedicated to ephemeral satisfaction and erotic drunkenness make up the changes of its vast poetic content. Having the maturity of an accomplished poet and the ability to create evocative images in a personal way, the poet introduces us to what constitutes the most brilliant expression of his most intimate thoughts and beliefs in front of the world of his time and age.

The way, too, where memory preserves what desire so often can’t sustain. That desire and longing were for other men only makes it appear more contemporary, closer in our own times as we see in this opening poem of Golden Kiss, which poem may seem obscene and prosaic created by a minor poet, but when creating by a poet as Manolis locks up the erotic aura of a Moravia.

 

like a bird stilled by camera lens

her scandalous vulva visits his mind

from days of that August

on the scorched island

in low tone siesta

in muffled moaning

lest the mirror would crack from tension

 

 

In the 1880s and 1890s, Constantine Cavafy was a young man with modest literary ambitions, writing verses and contributing articles, critiques and essays, mostly in Greek but in English (A language in which he was perfectly at home as a result of spending a few of his adolescence years in England), on a number of idiosyncratic subjects, Alexandria and Athenian newspapers. This similarity in biographies binds Cavafy with Manolis who lives in Vancouver and writes poems in Greek and English referring to both countries.

 

Yannis Ritsos was born in Monemvasia, Greece, on May 1, 1909, in a family of landowners. He did his early schooling and finished high school in Gythion, Monemvasia and after graduating in 1925, he moved to Athens where he began working on typing and copying legal documents. A year later, he returned to his home town where he spent his time writing and painting, another form of art that he devoted himself which along with his writing he kept for the rest of his life, perhaps the painting has given him elements of his sensual poems:

 

WOMEN

Our women are distant, their sheets smell of goodnight.

They put bread on the table as a token of themselves.

It’s then that we finally see we were at fault; we jump up saying,

‘Look, you’ve done too much, take it easy, I’ll light the lamp.

’She turns away with the striking of the match,

walking towards the kitchen, her face in shadow,

her back bent under the weight of so many dead –

those you both loved, those she loved, those

you alone loved . . . yes . . . and your death also

 

Listen: the bare boards creaking where she goes.

Listen: the dishes weeping in the dishrack.

Listen: the train taking soldiers to the front.

 

 

Sometimes the poems are invested with the fractured logic of the dream with images of dream events or they’re placed in a landscape of dreams that grows, as one reads more, more and more recognizable, less strange, always attractive. At the same time, their locations and quotations are redemptive of a completely recognizable Greece: the balconies, the geraniums, the statuary, women in their black attires and, in a lasting way, the sea. His touch is light, but its effect is profound. Much depends on the image that causes the narrative movement. Some poems are so small, so distilled, that the fragments of history given to us – the kids’ psychodramas – have an irresistible power. “The less I get the bigger it gets,” said Alberto Giacometti and the same powerful reticence is a feature in Ritsos’ shorter poems.

 

The content of Yannis Ritsos also deserves renewed attention – both the specific themes of the individual poems, which in fact keep the historical and the erotic in a single focus.

Eroticism is one of the appearances of man’s inner life. In this one deludes himself because one is seeking his fixed object of desire. But this object of desire responds to the internal desire. The choice of an object always depends on the individual’s personal tastes: even if it falls on the woman most would have selected, what comes into play is often an unspeakable aspect, not an objective characteristic of this woman unless she has touched the inner being of man she creates the force to choose her.

The notion of disorientation (similar, perhaps, to the effect of a mild virus), when heightened emotion puts us at odds with the world, when the aromas become sour, when a view of the garden becomes desolate, when household objects shed their purpose, is perfectly evoked in these ten lines. There is an immediate recognition of a precarious ontological state tied to a story until, a moment later, we realize that we can see that street, see that window, see through that door:

 

 

ALMOST

 

It was just luck: I open the door, the two women

side by side on the sofa

 

in his black handkerchief,

mother and daughter, perhaps,

 

staying immobile, unpronounceable, a mouthful of bread

on the table, a cat sleeping on the couch.

 

Looking away and the sun at the top of the waves, cicadas

the swallows attractions in blue. They look back.

 

I almost had it, I almost had it in one of them.

Then Mother got up and closed the door.

 

This poem by Yannis Ritsos refers us to another poem by Manolis but more sensual and right:

 

Nothing to hold onto

but ourselves in lust

and the cenotaph with

names engraved in marble

yet in this near futile void

a sudden speck of light

gleams on Suzanne’s breast

as a lightning flash like

when her eyes demanded

a deeper meaning to this: are we

to search for it during this dark night

with our two bodies as the only absolution?

 

The sensuality of the Mediterranean world may be in the Greek soul of the poets to a greater or lesser degree, as we have seen over the years and centuries, referring to the idea that the Greek gods though dead are alive in the souls of the Greeks: Eros and Dionysus are alive from the bygone days of yesteryears to today and even more so in the case of Manolis who lives in Vancouver but has not forgotten his Cretan roots, and he writes in both Greek and English and shows with his simple poem Golden Kiss the sensual and erotic connection between his poetry and that of Cavafy and Yannis Ritsos.

 

~Eric Ponty, poet, translator, Sao Paolo, Brazil, 2016

YANNIS RITSOS-SELECTED POEMS/TRANSLATED BY MANOLIS ALIGIZAKIS

Ritsos_front large

Yannis Ritsos – Poems

A careful hand is needed to translate the poems of Yannis Ritsos, and Manolis is the ideal poet to undertake such an enormous task. Born in Crete, Manolis’s youth was intermingled with the poetry of Ritsos. Once a young man moved by the Theodorakis version of Epitaphios, he’s now a successful poet in his own right who is still moved to tears hearing the refrains of those notes from half a century ago. His Greek heritage, with its knowledge of the terrain, people, history and cultural themes, makes his translation all the more true to what Ritsos intended. Having visited the very places of which Ritsos wrote, he knows how the light and sea shift, and how Ritsos imagined those changes as being a temperament and personality of the Greece itself. The parallels in their lives are uncanny: when Ritsos was imprisoned, Manolis’ father also was imprisoned on false charges. Both men dealt with the forces of dictators and censorship, and experienced the cruel and unreasoning forces of those times. In fact, they even lived for a time in the same neighborhood. In his foreword to Poems, Manolis relates that he viewed him as a comrade, one whose “work resonated with our intense passion for our motherland and also in our veracity and strong-willed quest to find justice for all Greeks.” In Poems, Manolis chose to honor Ritsos first by not just picking and choosing a few titles to translate, although that might have been far easier. Instead, he undertook the complex task of translating fifteen entire books of Ritsos work-an endeavor that took years of meticulous research and patience. It should be noted that along with the translation, edited by Apryl Leaf, that he also includes a significant Introduction that gives a reader unfamiliar with Ritsos an excellent background on the poet from his own perspective. Dated according to when Ritsos composed them, it’s fascinating to see how some days were especially productive for him. These small details are helpful in understanding the context and meaning. For example, in Notes on the Margins of Time, written from 1938-1941, Ritsos explores the forces of war that are trickling into even the smallest villages. Without direct commentary, he alludes to trains, blood, and the sea that takes soldiers away, seldom to return. Playing an active role in these violent times, the moon observes all, and even appears as a thief ready to steal life from whom it is still new. From “In the Barracks”:

The moon entered the barracks It rummaged in the soldiers’ blankets Touched an undressed arm Sleep Someone talks in his sleep Someone snores A shadow gesture on the long wall The last trolley bus went by Quietness

Can all these be dead tomorrow? Can they be dead from right now?

A soldier wakes up He looks around with glassy eyes A thread of blood hangs from the moon’s lips

In Romiosini, the postwar years are a focus (1945-1947), and they have not been kind. The seven parts to this piece each reflect a soldier’s journey home.

These trees don’t take comfort in less sky These rocks don’t take comfort under foreigners’ Footsteps These faces don’t’ take comfort but only In the sun These hearts don’t take comfort except in justice.

The return to his country is marked by bullet-ridden walls, burnt-out homes, decay, and the predominantly female populace, one that still hears the bombs falling and the screams of the dead as they dully gaze about, looking for fathers, husbands, and sons. The traveler’s journey is marked by introspection and grim memories reflected on to the surfaces of places and things he thought he knew.

And now is the time when the moon kisses him sorrowfully Close to his ear The seaweed the flowerpot the stool and the stone ladder Say good evening to him And the mountains the seas and cities and the sky Say good evening to him And then finally shaking the ash off his cigarette Over the iron railing He may cry because of his assurance He may cry because of the assurance of the trees and The stars and his brothers

An entirely different feeling is found in Parentheses, composed 1946-1947. In it, healing is observed and a generosity of spirit exerts itself among those whose hearts had been previously crushed. In “Understanding”:

A woman said good morning to someone – so simple and natural Good morning… Neither division nor subtraction To be able to look outside Yourself-warmth and serenity Not to be ‘just yourself’ but ‘you too’ A small addition A small act of practical arithmetic easily understood…

On the surface, it may appear simple, a return to familiarity that may have been difficulty in times of war. Yet on another level, he appears to be referring to the unity among the Greek people-the ‘practical arithmetic’ that kept them united though their political state was volatile. Essentially timeless, his counsel goes far beyond nationalism.

Moonlight Sonata, written in 1956, is an impossibly romantic and poignant lyric poem that feels more like a short story. In it, a middle-aged woman talks to a young man in her rustic home. As he prepares to leave, she asks to walk with him a bit in the moonlight. “The moon is good –it doesn’t show my gray hair. The moon will turn my hair gold again. You won’t see the difference. Let me come with you”

Her refrain is repeated over and over as they walk, with him silent and her practically begging him to take her away from the house and its memories:

I know that everyone marches to love alone Alone to glory and to death I know it I tried it It’s of no use Let me come with you

The poem reveals her memories as well as his awkward silence, yet at the end of their journey, she doesn’t leave. Ritsos leaves the ending open: was it a dream? If not, why did she not go? What hold did the house have over her? Was it just the moonlight or a song on the radio that emboldened her?

In 1971, Ritsos wrote The Caretaker’s Desk in Athens, where he was under surveillance but essentially free. At this time he seems to be translating himself-that of how he was processing his own personal history. Already acclaimed for his work, perhaps he was uncertain of his own identity.

From “The Unknown”,

He knew what his successive disguises stood for (even with them often out of time and always vague) A fencer a herald a priest a rope-walker A hero a victim a dead Iphigenia He didn’t know The one he disguised himself as His colorful costumes Pile on the floor covering the hole of the floor And on top of the pile the carved golden mask And in the cavity of the mask the unfired pistol

If he is indeed discussing his identity, it’s with incredible honesty as to both his public persona and his private character. After all, he’d been nominated for the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1968 (and eight more times) and he was likely weighing, in his later years, all that he’d endured.

The beauty of this particular translation is that, while subjects and emotions change over time, they still feel united by the underlying character of Ritsos. Some translators leave their own imprint or influence, yet this feels free of such adjustment. It’s as if Ritsos’ voice itself has been translated, with the pauses, humor, and pace that identify the subtle characteristics of an individual.

~Wikipedia

Review of “FILLOROES”/ΦΥΛΛΟΡΡΟΕΣ-κριτική.

filloroes

 Filloroes-a review

        Greek Canadian author Manolis Aligizakis has written three novels, numerous collections of poetry, articles and short stories in both Greek and English. His latest poetry book “Filloroes” consists of existential, erotic and sociopolitical themed poems with clear relation to everyday as well as to historical events. Emotions flow freely throughout the book. They are expressed via images of love, lust, unfaithfulness, loss and the feeling of the unaccomplished, search for the meaning of life, high ideals and the lack of freedom. The poet’s style and idiom are accentuated by his rhythm that is tied harmoniously with the content. Certain melancholy runs through the majority of the poems and underscores the battle between optimism and pessimism: “I want to plough/this ground all over/with a crop of new idealists…” (Saunter).

        The style of the book, sometimes resembling prose, is accented by poetic conventions such as repetition, and the striding of verse that bring the poems to life. Similar result is shown by detail descriptions, rich imagery and musicality of the verse. The existential poems deal with death, weight of life and its meaning, old age, the inescapable end, fate, decadence. The erotic poems display a mixture of emotions such as desire, joy, sadness, denial, betrayal, loneliness and the convention of relationships. Although pain and disappointment are imbued in Eros the poet still considers it the most important variant of life: “and I leave my search/for something inconceivable/ or imaginary/and with no other word/I return/to your sensual loving.”(Discovery).

        Social-political issues such as political struggle, sacrifice of comrades, defeat, history up to today, relation of the church to war, wondering and vision of a future Greece, the misery of city life, destruction, salvation, justice, the poet/poetess before today’s reality, are subjects of these poems. Sometimes at the end of some poems Manolis poses questions that are themselves the answers to such questions: “And you wonder/are we truly making progress/or careening brakeless of-ramps to Hell?” (Routine). Other times the poems lead to serious questioning: “and the young sparrow/sits on the branch and/clipping his wing feathers writes/no need for these anymore” (Sparrows). The collection is imbued by sensitivity toward the everyday human situations and is filled by serious questioning about the emotional death of today’s social landscape and the brutality we live in.

 ΦΥΛΛΟΡΡΟΕΣ-FYLLORROES, ΕΝΕΚΕΝ, 2013

Ο Ελληνοκαναδός Μανώλης Αλυγιζάκης έχει γράψει τρία μυθιστορήματα, ποιητικές συλλογές, καθώς και άρθρα, διηγήματα και μελέτες στα αγγλικά και στα ελληνικά. Η πρόσφατη ποιητική συλλογή του ‘Φυλλορροές’ απαρτίζεται από υπαρξιακά, ερωτικά και κοινωνικοπολιτικά θέματα, με στενή αναφορά στην καθημερινότητα αλλά και σε σπουδαία ιστορικά γεγονότα. Το συναίσθημα ρέει πλούσια σε όλη τη συλλογή. Εκφράζεται μέσα από θέματα όπως η αγάπη, ο έρωτας, η απιστία, η απώλεια και το αίσθημα του ανεκπλήρωτου, η αναζήτηση της ουσίας της ζωής, τα υψηλά ιδανικά, και η έλλειψη ελευθερίας. Το χαρακτηριστικό ύφος ενισχύεται από τον ήχο και τον ρυθμό, που δένουν αρμονικά με το περιεχόμενο. Μια μελαγχολική διάθεση διατρέχει το σύνολο των ποιημάτων, δίνοντας τον τόνο στην πάλη μεταξύ αισιοδοξίας και απαισιοδοξίας: «…κι είπε -/ θέλω να σπείρω/ τούτο το χώμα απ’ την αρχή/ με μια σοδειά νέων ιδεολόγων…» («Νωχελικό απόγευμα»).

Η γραφή, αν και κάποιες φορές στα όρια του πεζού λόγου, διανθίζεται από ιδιαίτερα ποιητικά στοιχεία. Τεχνικές όπως η επανάληψη και ο διασκελισμός τονίζουν το νοηματικό περιεχόμενο δίνοντας ζωντάνια στη συλλογή. Παρόμοιο αποτέλεσμα επιτυγχάνεται από τις λεπτομερείς περιγραφές, τις πλούσιες εικόνες και τη μουσικότητα του λόγου. Το θέμα της ύπαρξης αναφέρεται στον θάνατο, στο βάρος της ζωής και στο νόημά της, στο γήρας, στο αναπόφευκτο και τη μοίρα, στην παρακμή. Τα ερωτικά ποιήματα εκθέτουν μια γκάμα συναισθημάτων όπως ο πόθος, η χαρά, η θλίψη, η διάψευση, η προδοσία, η παρακμή, η απομάκρυνση του ζευγαριού και η συμβατικότητα της συνύπαρξης. Παρά τον πόνο και την απογοήτευση που συνδέονται με τον έρωτα, ο ποιητής τον θεωρεί το πιο ουσιαστικό συστατικό της ζωής: «…κι αφήνω στη στιγμή την έρευνά μου/ για κάτι ασύλληπτο ή ιδεατό/ και δίχως λέξη βιαστικά γυρνώ/ στο αισθησιακό σου φίλημα.» («Ανακάλυψη»).

Οι κοινωνικοπολιτικές ανησυχίες εκφράζονται μέσα από θέματα όπως ο πολιτικός αγώνας, η αυτοθυσία των συντρόφων και η ήττα, η ιστορία και το σήμερα, η σχέση της Εκκλησίας με τον πόλεμο, προβληματισμοί και προβλέψεις για το μέλλον, η Ελλάδα, η αθλιότητα της ζωής στην πόλη, η καταστροφή, η σωτηρία, η απόδοση δικαιοσύνης, ο ποιητής/η ποιήτρια μπροστά στην πολιτική πραγματικότητα. Στο τέλος κάποιων ποιημάτων ο Μανώλης Αλυγιζάκης θέτει δυνατά ερωτηματικά, ερωτηματικά που μοιάζουν να αποτελούν από μόνα τους τις απαντήσεις: «…Κι αναρωτιέσαι/ κάνουμε άραγε κάτι σωστό/ ή όλα βαδίζουν ίσια προς την κόλαση;» («Ρουτίνα»). Άλλες φορές το κλείσιμο των ποιημάτων παραπέμπει σε σημαντικά ερωτήματα: «…Κι ένας μικρός σπουργίτης/ καθισμένος στο κλαδί/ συνθέτει το πρωινό του ποίημα και/ τα φτερά του ψαλιδίζοντας γράφει,/ αυτά δεν μου χρειάζονται πια» («Σπουργίτες»). Η ποιητική συλλογή διακρίνεται από ευαισθησία για τις ανθρώπινες καταστάσεις και από έντονο κοινωνικό προβληματισμό, στηρίγματα πολύτιμα μέσα στη γενική συναισθηματική νέκρωση και την ακραία βαρβαρότητα που βιώνουμε.

 

Αφροδίτη Γιαννάκη, ΕΝΕΚΕΝ, 2013/Aphroditi Giannakis, ENEKEN, 2013